Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note10's general score of 89. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note10, it is somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier. Galaxy Note10 has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy Note10, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a better pixel quantity per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way bigger sensor, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra costs more money than Samsung Galaxy Note10, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.