Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-23 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.89 ounces | -- |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note10, having a global score of 90.7 against 89. Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is noticeably lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy Note10. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a lot better performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better display than Galaxy Note10, because it has a little bit larger display, more pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution. The Galaxy Note10 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra count with extremely similar storage for games and applications, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way better video resolution, a way more megapixels camera in the back and a way bigger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.