Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-08-23 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | -- |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than the Galaxy S6 Active, with a overall score of 89 against 80.9. Galaxy S6 Active features a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Galaxy S6 Active counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note10, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64-bit processor. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy S6 Active counts with a battery performance that's just as good as the Galaxy Note10 one. The Galaxy Note10 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a much less mega pixels camera, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations and a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S6 Active. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy S6 Active, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.