Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-08-23 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than Galaxy S7 edge's score of 78.1. Even though Galaxy Note10 is way newer than Galaxy S7 edge, it's a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. Galaxy Note10 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S7 edge has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity. Galaxy Note10 captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a same resolution camera, the Galaxy Note10 also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light situations.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.