Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2019-08-23 | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S9's 83.3 overall score. Samsung Galaxy Note10's construction is newer and a little thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S9. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a camera that is very similar to the camera in Samsung Galaxy Note10, they have a same resolution camera in the back, the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same diafragm aperture, the same camera sensor size and the same video definition.
Galaxy Note10 features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Galaxy Note10 features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has a 17% larger battery size.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S9, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S9. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note10, else you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy S9, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.