Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2021-03-12 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is better than the Galaxy XCover 5, having an 89 score against 78.1. The Galaxy Note10 construction is thinner and a little lighter than the Galaxy XCover 5, even though it was released just a little more than a year before. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a bit superior processor than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a larger display, more pixels per display inch and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a slightly better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Note10 has just a little better battery duration than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a much worse 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.