Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 400 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a score of 89 against 80.1. Although the Galaxy Note10 and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released only 8 months apart, the Galaxy Note10 is much thinner and much lighter. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note10 features more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Galaxy Note10 captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels camera, the same back-facing camera sensor size and a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note10 also has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy Note10 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.