Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, having an 89 score against 81. The Galaxy Note10 design is incredibly thinner and much lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, even when both of them were released only 5 months apart. Galaxy XCover Pro features a screen that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy Note10's screen, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a just a little better pixel number in each display inch and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a same size screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a larger aperture and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.