Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's 88.5 global score. Samsung Galaxy Note10's construction is a bit lighter but just a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and both were only released with a few months difference. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note10, because it has a little better screen density, a slightly better 1080 x 2636px resolution and a little bit bigger display.
Galaxy Z Flip's storage capacity to install applications and games is very similar to the Galaxy Note10 one, both have equal internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy Note10. Both have 8 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a little better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 6 percent more battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip and Galaxy Note10 count with similar cameras, and although the Galaxy Z Flip has a tinier aperture, they both have a 0.39 inches back camera sensor, the same 60 fps video frame rates, the same (4K) video definition and a 12 megapixels resolution back camera.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy Note10 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.