Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, getting an 89 score against 85.6. Despite of the fact Galaxy Note10 is older and thicker than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, it's body is still a little bit lighter. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a bit bigger screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little bit greater number of pixels in each inch of display.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3's CPU is very similar to Samsung Galaxy Note10's processor, both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Galaxy Note10 features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a little better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy Note10 is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.