Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, getting an 89 score against 87.9. The Galaxy Note10 is a much lighter and thinner device than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, although both of them were released only 9 months apart. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's CPU is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Note10 one, and although the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy Note10 features a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 3500mAh. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a much smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot higher video quality, a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution camera and a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.