Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is better than the Xiaomi Poco M3's 78.2 overall score. Samsung Galaxy Note10's design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Poco M3, even though it was released about 15 months before. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Note10 features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera and a much larger sensor shooting way better quality photos and videos.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Poco M3. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Note10, else you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Poco M3, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.