Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T's global score of 78.2. Galaxy Note10 is an older cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, but it is somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. The Galaxy Note10 has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater quantity of pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi 9T captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photos in low light situations and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with more memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.