Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2013-09-25 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, having a score of 80 against 77.7. The Google Pixel 3 construction is noticeably newer, somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy Note3. Google Pixel 3 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a bit more pixels per display inch.
Google Pixel 3 has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note3 has a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note3 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 64 GB.
The Google Pixel 3 captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a back camera with a worse 12.2 MP resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and a bigger sensor capturing better quality videos and photos.
Galaxy Note3 counts with just a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3200mAh battery size against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.