Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-09-25 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is slightly better than Galaxy Note3, having a global score of 78.8 against 77.7. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 3a has the previous 11 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2. The Google Pixel 3a construction is incredibly newer, somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than the Galaxy Note3.
Google Pixel 3a has a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater quantity of pixels in each screen inch and a slightly better 1080 x 2220 pixels resolution. Galaxy Note3 counts with a way bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note3 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 64 GB.
The Google Pixel 3a features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores. Google Pixel 3a shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a worse resolution back camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture and a larger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 counts with a little longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 7 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.