Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2013-09-25 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note3's 77.7 general score. Google Pixel 4's body is notably newer, a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Galaxy Note3. The Google Pixel 4 features just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Google Pixel 4 also has a little greater display pixel density and a quite better 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. Galaxy Note3 has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy Note3 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 64 GB.
The Galaxy Note3 counts with just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a worse 12.2 MP resolution, it also counts with a much bigger camera aperture and a larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.