Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2013-09-25 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note3, getting a global score of 82.9 against 77.7. Google Pixel 4 XL's construction is extremely newer and just a little thinner than Galaxy Note3's, but it is also somewhat heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a quite larger display, a much better resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a higher pixel quantity per inch of screen.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4 XL takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a camera with a lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture for better photography in low-light environments and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 counts with much more memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note3 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 64 GB. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 16% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.