Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has an overall score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note3's 77.7 overall score. The Google Pixel 4a construction is a lot newer, somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than Galaxy Note3. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a has the older 11 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
Google Pixel 4a counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little bit larger display and a just a little greater display pixels density. The Google Pixel 4a features a little bit more memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 4a counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has 3 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Google Pixel 4a features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a worse video resolution and a back camera with less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor taking better quality videos and pictures and a lot bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video.
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 features just a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 2% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.