Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the Galaxy Note3, having a general score of 87.5 against 77.7. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a a little thinner cellphone than the Galaxy Note3, but both of them have the same weight. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy Note3, because it has 3 GB more RAM and more cpu cores. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a little higher display density, a quite better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a back camera with lesser megapixels resolution and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photos and a lot bigger aperture for better images and video in low-light environments.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features superior battery performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.