Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is better than the Galaxy Note3, getting a overall score of 89 against 77.7. The Google Pixel 5 construction is much newer, a little thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy Note3. The Google Pixel 5 counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Google Pixel 5 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a bit better pixels density and a little bigger screen. The Google Pixel 5 features a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 5 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a lower video definition and a worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much larger aperture to take better images and video in low light situations.
Google Pixel 5 has improved battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 28% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.