Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 5.0 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 386 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.2 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note3's score of 77.7. HTC One M9 is a newer and just a little bit lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, although it is thicker. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but HTC One M9 has newer 5.0 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version, so it counts with some extra features.
HTC One M9 counts with a much better screen than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1920 x 1080, the HTC One M9 also counts with a bit higher pixels density. The HTC One M9 has a faster processing unit than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the HTC One M9 also has a graphics processing unit, a larger number of cores and a 64 bits processing unit.
The HTC One M9 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the HTC One M9 also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and a way better resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Note3 features a better memory for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 64 GB against 128 GB, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy Note3 has just a little bit longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 13% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.