Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2013-09-25 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 386 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 has an overall score of 77.7, which is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra's general score of 77. Even though Galaxy Note3 is incredibly older and a little bit thicker than HTC U Ultra, it's body is still just a little lighter. The HTC U Ultra has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have a same size screen, the HTC U Ultra also has a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per display inch.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note3 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than HTC U Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have 4 CPU cores.
HTC U Ultra captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a less MP back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos.
Galaxy Note3 features just a little better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.