Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2013-09-25 | 2018-11-09 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 has a score of 77.7, which is slightly better than LG G7 Fit's global score of 77. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but Galaxy Note3 has the older 4.4.2 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, the Galaxy Note3 is a noticeably older, just a bit thicker and a bit heavier cellphone than the LG G7 Fit.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 features a bit faster processing unit than LG G7 Fit, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The LG G7 Fit has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a better pixels density, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a little larger display.
The LG G7 Fit has a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting lower quality images, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a higher 16 megapixels resolution camera.
LG G7 Fit features a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note3 has just a little bit longer battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 7% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.