Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-09-25 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has an overall score of 82.7, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3's 77.7 global score. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the LG G8X ThinQ has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2. LG G8X ThinQ is a heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Note3, but they are 0.33inches thick.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a quite bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. LG G8X ThinQ has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger number of cores and 3 GB more RAM memory.
LG G8X ThinQ features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser megapixels and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better images and video in poorly lited situations and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
LG G8X ThinQ has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG G8X ThinQ has better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.