Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Titan gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note3's 77.7 score. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS, but the LG K92 has the previous 10 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2. The LG K92 design has the same thickness than Galaxy Note3, but it's somewhat heavier.
LG K92 has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater number of cores (but slower) and 3 GB more RAM memory. LG K92 features just a bit better display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a bit higher pixel density, a bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
LG K92 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG K92 also has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a lot larger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and a bigger aperture for better low light images and videos.
LG K92 features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. The LG K92 counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.