Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2013-09-25 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note3, with a overall score of 82.5 against 77.7. These phones work with Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2. The LG V30S ThinQ is a notably newer cellphone, and it is also just a little lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy Note3.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a much higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The LG V30S ThinQ features a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 3 percent larger battery capacity. LG V30S ThinQ shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality photographs, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a way larger aperture to take better low-light photography and a back-facing camera with more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.