Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is much better than Galaxy Note3, having a score of 87.6 against 77.7. The LG V60 ThinQ design is incredibly newer than the Galaxy Note3's, although it is just a little bit thicker and heavier. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but LG V60 ThinQ has the previous 11 version and Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460, a larger screen and a just a bit greater pixels density. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit better CPU than Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM. The LG V60 ThinQ captures slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note3, because it has a lot higher video quality, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior battery life than Galaxy Note3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.