Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than Samsung Galaxy Note3, having an 87.1 score against 77.7. The LG Velvet is a notably newer and a little bit thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy Note3, although it's just a little heavier. LG Velvet counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 3 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
LG Velvet features just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a quite higher pixel density, a larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460px. LG Velvet counts with a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The LG Velvet counts with greater battery life than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. The LG Velvet shoots better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG Velvet also has a way larger camera sensor shooting way better quality photos, a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a larger camera aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.