Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a global score of 81.9, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note3's 77.7 global score. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo design is newer and a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Note3's, but it is a bit heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better looking screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a quite greater quantity of pixels in each display inch, a higher 1256 x 2760 resolution and a quite larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a lot bigger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality, a camera with lot more megapixels and a larger aperture to take better low-light captures.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a very superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has superior battery performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4310mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.