Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than Galaxy Note3, having a general score of 86.3 against 77.7. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit heavier than the Galaxy Note3, it's a little thinner and also incredibly newer. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an older 14 version and Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little bit higher display density and a larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a way more mega-pixels camera, a lot bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low-light environments and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.