Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note3, getting a score of 87.1 against 77.7. These devices work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, it's a little thicker and somewhat heavier.
Galaxy Note3 features a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much sharper display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a bigger display, a little better display density and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera, a much bigger sensor capturing way higher quality photographs, a much bigger camera aperture and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 41 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.