Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G has a global score of 81.5, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note3's 77.7 general score. The Moto G 5G body is extremely newer than the Galaxy Note3's, although it is incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones include Android operating system, but Moto G 5G has an older 10 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2.
The Motorola Moto G 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has more cores (although slower) and more RAM. Moto G 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a little bit higher screen density, a larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. Motorola Moto G 5G features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a way better resolution back camera and a lot larger aperture.
Motorola Moto G 5G has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.