Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note3 is just a bit better than Moto G Power, having a score of 77.7 against 76.1. These devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a more recent 4.4.2 version and Moto G Power has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy Note3's body is somewhat lighter and thinner than Moto G Power, although it was released 7 years before.
Moto G Power counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a little higher pixel density, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2300 pixels and a little bit larger display. Moto G Power counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto G Power also has a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 4 more CPU cores (although they are slower). The Moto G Power takes just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Power also has a way bigger diafragm aperture, a better 16 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a larger back camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
The Moto G Power has a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 56% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.