Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 is just a bit better than Moto G8 Power, getting a score of 77.7 against 76. Galaxy Note3 is an noticeably older phone than Moto G8 Power, but Samsung managed to make it lighter and thinner. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note3 has the newer 4.4.2 version and Moto G8 Power has Android 10 version, giving you some nice extra features and better performance.
Motorola Moto G8 Power features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4 more cores and more RAM. Motorola Moto G8 Power has just a bit better screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a little bit larger display, a bit better pixel count in each inch in the display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2300 pixels.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power shoots clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G8 Power also has a much bigger aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited environments, a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a more mega-pixels camera.
The Moto G8 Power features a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G8 Power also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Moto G8 Power features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.