Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2013-09-25 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 is a bit better than the Moto Z Force, with a global score of 77.7 against 75.8. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note3 has the older 4.4.2 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Galaxy Note3 design is way older, just a little heavier and thicker than the Moto Z Force.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a bit sharper display than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. Moto Z Force and Samsung Galaxy Note3 both count with extremely similar processors, and although the Moto Z Force has a higher amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Moto Z Force has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a larger camera aperture. Moto Z Force has much more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z Force features just a little better battery life than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.