Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2013-09-25 | 2016-07-28 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 is slightly better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, getting a 77.7 score against 76.4. Galaxy Note3 is better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, we must note that it is also notably older, a little heavier and somewhat thicker. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a processor that is just as good as the Galaxy Note3 one, and although the Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a higher amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen. Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a way more MP camera and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photos.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.