Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2013-09-25 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 is just a bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a score of 77.7 against 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note3 is better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, we must highlight that it is also extremely older, noticeably thicker and somewhat heavier. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a sharper screen than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater screen pixels density.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Note3, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more cpu cores. The Moto Z2 Force Edition's camera is very similar to Samsung Galaxy Note3's camera, because although the Moto Z2 Force Edition has a less mega-pixels back-facing camera and a worse video definition, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations and a bigger sensor shooting higher quality photos.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note3 has improved battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.