Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2013-09-25 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, getting a score of 77.7 against 77.4. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, Galaxy Note3's construction is older, extremely thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola Moto Z2 Play. Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more cpu cores.
Moto Z2 Play has a bit better screen than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 1920px resolution, the Moto Z2 Play also counts with a quite higher number of pixels in each display inch. Samsung Galaxy Note3 has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Note3 also counts with a back facing camera with more mega pixels.
Moto Z2 Play has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto Z2 Play also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note3 counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 7 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.