Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2013-09-25 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note3 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3, having a general score of 77.7 against 77.6. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy Note3 is an a lot older, just a little bit heavier and thicker phone than the Motorola Moto Z3. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note3 has 4.4.2 version while Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Motorola Moto Z3 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2160 resolution, a just a little higher display pixels density and a quite larger display. The Moto Z3 features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z3 also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto Z3 has a bit superior processor than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4 more cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Moto Z3 and Galaxy Note3 both have similar cameras, because although the Moto Z3 has a back facing camera with a worse 12 megapixels resolution and a lower video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a larger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy Note3 counts with just a bit better battery life than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.