Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2013-09-25 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 is just a bit better than Moto Z3 Play, getting a overall score of 77.7 against 76.3. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note3 is better than the Moto Z3 Play, it must be told that it's also a much older, a little heavier and somewhat thicker device. Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a little bigger display, a slightly higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a bit higher pixels density.
The Galaxy Note3 has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores. Motorola Moto Z3 Play features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 counts with just a little better battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 7% bigger battery size. Motorola Moto Z3 Play shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution and a lower video definition, it also counts with a way bigger aperture and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.