Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a score of 79.8, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Note3's 77.7 overall score. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola One Hyper has an older 11 version and Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2. Motorola One Hyper's body is newer than Galaxy Note3's, although it is just a bit thicker and heavier.
The Motorola One Hyper has a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a just a bit greater pixels count in each screen inch. Motorola One Hyper features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4 more CPU cores (although slower) and 1 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola One Hyper captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also has a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a bigger aperture to take better low-light images.
Motorola One Hyper features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory. The Motorola One Hyper counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.