Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Galaxy Note3, getting an 87 score against 77.7. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version and Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version. The Motorola razr (2020) is a newer and a little thinner phone than the Galaxy Note3, but it's heavier.
Motorola razr (2020) has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has 5 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores. Motorola razr (2020) features a screen that is just as good as the display in Galaxy Note3, because although the Motorola razr (2020) has a just a little inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen and a quite lower 876 x 2142 resolution, it also counts with a little larger screen.
The Motorola razr (2020) captures a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much better 48 MP resolution back facing camera, a much larger back-facing camera sensor and a way bigger aperture for better images and video in low light situations.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy Note3 counts with a bit better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 14% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.