Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a score of 77.7, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Note3's 77.7 global score. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but OPPO Find X2 Neo has the previous 10 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version. OPPO Find X2 Neo's body is noticeably newer and a little bit thinner than Galaxy Note3's, but it is just a little bit heavier.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a much better looking display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a quite better pixel number per display inch. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 4 more cpu cores. The OPPO Find X2 Neo shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back, a lot bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light situations and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has improved battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.