Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Ocean |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy Note3, with an 83.1 score against 77.7. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but OPPO Find X2 Pro has older 10 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2. OPPO Find X2 Pro's body is notably newer, but a little thicker and heavier than Galaxy Note3.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a sharper screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger screen, a higher display pixel density and a way higher 1440 x 3168 resolution. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4 more processing cores and more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a lot higher resolution back facing camera, a much larger camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs and a lot larger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.