Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is just a bit better than Galaxy Note3, with a overall score of 79.9 against 77.7. The Galaxy A25 5G is a somewhat heavier phone than Galaxy Note3, but both of them are equally thin. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A25 5G has the previous 14 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Galaxy Note3 has a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM. Galaxy A25 5G has a sharper screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a bit larger screen, a bit better quantity of pixels in each screen inch and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A25 5G features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note3, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Galaxy A25 5G has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.