Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy Note3, getting a general score of 90.8 against 77.7. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a extremely newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, although it's a little thicker and heavier. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater amount of RAM and more processing cores (although slower). Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a little bit better screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a quite bigger display, a bit higher display density and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a larger aperture and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.