Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is better than Galaxy Note3's 77.7 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's body has the same thickness than the Galaxy Note3, but it's heavier. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an older 12 version and Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more processing cores. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a just a bit higher pixels density and a quite bigger display.
The Galaxy A52 5G has much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A52 5G shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos, a much higher resolution camera and a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.