Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-09-25 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 has a general score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 global score. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note3 has a more recent 4.4.2 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, so it provides some nice extra features and optimized performance. Despite of the fact Galaxy Note3 is older and a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A70, it's construction is still just a bit lighter.
Galaxy A70 counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a just a little greater quantity of pixels in each display inch, a larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy A70 has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A70 has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4 more CPU cores and more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note3 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller sensor giving a lower image quality and a lot tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited situations, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates.
The Galaxy A70 features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.