Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3's 77.7 overall score. Even though Samsung Galaxy F62 is notably newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, it's a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a bigger screen, a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little higher display density. The Galaxy F62 counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have 4 CPU cores, the Galaxy F62 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 119% more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a bigger aperture, a lot bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures and a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.