Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2013-09-25 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M20 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note3, getting a general score of 78.9 against 77.7. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M20 has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version. Samsung Galaxy M20's construction is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note3's, although it's just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 features a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2340px resolution, a little greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen and a quite larger screen. Galaxy Note3 counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy M20, although it has 4 less cpu cores and less RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M20 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note3 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy Note3 also counts with a larger sensor which offers a better image and video quality and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.